- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Trust (Elvis Costello album)
- ... that Elvis Costello and the Attractions were consistently intoxicated during recording of the album Trust, with Costello writing "This was easily the most drug-influenced record of my career"? Source: Thomson, Graeme (2004). Complicated Shadows: The Life and Music of Elvis Costello. Edinburgh: Canongate Books. ISBN 978-1-84195-796-8. Chapter 7. Costello, Elvis (2003). Trust (reissue) (Inset). Elvis Costello and the Attractions. US: Rhino Entertainment. R2 73909.
Improved to Good Article status by Zmbro (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 21:37, 25 January 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Trust (Elvis Costello album), so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
@Onegreatjoke and Zmbro: I'm approving this nomination. Earwig initially reported a high likelihood of plagiarism, but it turned out to be quotations, so we're all good there. I must say, however, that the hook would sound better as:
Let me know what you think. Unlimitedlead (talk) 18:00, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah take out the quote. Makes it way too long. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 20:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
@Onegreatjoke and Zmbro: I'm approving this nomination. Earwig initially reported a high likelihood of plagiarism, but it turned out to be quotations, so we're all good there. I must say, however, that the hook would sound better as: