- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Tuệ Tĩnh
Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 15:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Solid nomination. It's long enough at about 2,000 characters, and it's new enough (created November 27). I was able to directly verify the references to De Vries's and Leung's book chapters, and I will 
assume good faith for the other references I don't have ready access to. And while the average Wikipedian's knowledge of Vietnamese traditional medicine is not something that can be guessed, I think someone being a "founding father" of the tradition would be interesting to a curious reader. QPQ is complete, and the article had a staggering 0% score on Earwig, so copyvio seems very unlikely. As an aside, I don't think "a temple was built in honour of him during the mid-nineteenth century" needs to be couched as something a nineteenth-century source claims. The first part of that paragraph in Leung is quoting a nineteenth-century source, but the sentence about the temple built in Tuệ Tĩnh's honor is in Leung's own scholarly voice. But that's just advice; I don't think that's a serious enough issue to impede eligibility for Did You Know. All in all, the nomination qualifies. Nicely done! P-Makoto (talk) 06:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks P-Makoto, I have taken your advice all the same :) Kingoflettuce (talk) 07:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Solid nomination. It's long enough at about 2,000 characters, and it's new enough (created November 27). 
assume good faith for the other references I don't have ready access to. And while the average Wikipedian's knowledge of Vietnamese traditional medicine is not something that can be guessed, I think someone being a "founding father" of the tradition would be interesting to a curious reader. QPQ is complete, and the article had a staggering 0% score on Earwig, so copyvio seems very unlikely. As an aside, I don't think "a temple was built in honour of him during the mid-nineteenth century" needs to be couched as something a nineteenth-century source claims. The first part of that paragraph in Leung is quoting a nineteenth-century source, but the sentence about the temple built in Tuệ Tĩnh's honor is in Leung's own scholarly voice. But that's just advice; I don't think that's a serious enough issue to impede eligibility for Did You Know. All in all, the nomination qualifies. Nicely done! P-Makoto (talk) 06:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)