Template:Did you know nominations/USRC Surveyor

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

USRC Surveyor

(

)

The crew of Samuel Travis' USRC Surveyor prepares to repel a Royal Navy boarding party

~~... that whether he was on land or sea, from 1775 to 1813, the Royal Navy couldn't resist attacking Samuel Travis?~~

*ALT1:... that, in 1775, the Royal Navy attacked Samuel Travis' house, then returned 37 years later and attacked his ship?
- ALT2 ... that the Royal Navy attacked Samuel Travis' house in 1775, then returned 37 years later and attacked his ship (pictured)?
Reviewed: ~~forthcoming~~ Template:Did you know nominations/Stellaluna
Comment: Maybe hold for 1 April if the first hook is used?

Created by Chetsford (talk). Self-nominated at 10:35, 28 February 2019 (UTC).

@Chetsford: Here's my review. epicgenius (talk) 22:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems: - I like ALT1 better. ALT0 implies Travis was continuously attacked, which isn't the case. ALT1 isn't false, though, and it does technically meet all the criteria. But there's a minor grammar slip-up nagging at me, and I can't pinpoint it, so I'd go with this instead:
- ... that the Royal Navy attacked Samuel Travis' house in 1775, then returned 37 years later and attacked his ship?

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: epicgenius (talk) 22:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

epicgenius - thanks much! I've done the QPQ now and added the Alt. I also added an image for your consideration. Chetsford (talk) 23:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@Chetsford: No problem and thanks for responding quickly. The image is fine. Looks like this is good to go now. epicgenius (talk) 00:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)