Template:Did you know nominations/United Airlines Flight 328

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 07:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

United Airlines Flight 328

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

The airplane in 2012

• ... that following an engine failure, United Airlines Flight 328 (airplane pictured) rained debris over Broomfield, Colorado? (Source: The Washington Post)
  • ALT1:... that debris falling from United Airlines Flight 328 (airplane pictured) was recorded by cellphone cameras? (Source: BBC)

Created by Kencf0618 (talk), AnAUsedSubcompact (talk), and WikiPediaAid (talk). Nominated by AllegedlyHuman (talk) at 05:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - Some sources need to be replaced with equivalents from higher-quality publications, such as the Twitter links, primary-source videos (Youtube, Twitter, Reddit), and direct airfleet listings.
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: QPQ not needed for a new nominator. As long as the sources are cleaned up, I think this could be good to go, maybe with some modifications to the hook. SounderBruce 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

I've removed the social media sources from the article; it seemed to be no issue, as all sentences they were attributed to had independent reliable sources as well. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

@AllegedlyHuman: There are still quite a few problematic sources: BroomfieldPD Twitter, Flightradar24, Aviation-Safety Wiki, AirFleets.net, one YouTube video, and Aerossurance, among others. These need to be replaced. SounderBruce 04:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Well, I was telling the truth when I said I removed those sources before–but it seems several less competent editors have added them in different places in the time since. I've taken another stab at it, though. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 14:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

• @AllegedlyHuman: Any updates on this? It's been a month already. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
  • @AllegedlyHuman: Comment: I can't approve the article for DYK but the sources look much better now. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 21:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment I notice that YouTube is cited in a few places. I don't know if that's allowable...4meter4 (talk) 01:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

• YouTube link removed, source for engine type added, minor cleanup done. ALT1 is trivial; let's go with the first hook. Drmies (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)