- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 15:46, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
WBFS-TV
Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 01:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/WBFS-TV; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
 - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
|
Overall: 
Aarticle length and age are fine. No copyvio or plagiarism concerns. QPQ and Status updated to y. Thanks. Path2space (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Path2space: Welcome to DYK reviewing. I did a QPQ, so you need to mark "y" in the
|qpq= field, and why is the status "again"? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:11, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Path2space: If the DYK is fine, you put "y" in the
|status= parameter. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Aarticle length and age are fine. No copyvio or plagiarism concerns. QPQ and Status updated to y. Thanks. Path2space (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)