- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Wei Liaoweng
edit( )
- ... that a Chinese acting troupe was flogged for slander after they portrayed the scholar Wei Liaoweng as a drunkard?
Source: https://books.google.com/books?id=xaw0G_D34q4C&pg=PA337
- Reviewed: Oecophylla smaragdina
Created by Yunshui (talk). Self-nominated at 12:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC).
New & long enough, looks neutral. Hook checks out. Earwig says "Violation Unlikely, 0.0% confidence. Include the century? Johnbod (talk) 04:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Certainly could do. Do you prefer ALT1:"... that a thirteenth-century Chinese acting troupe was flogged for slander after they portrayed the scholar Wei Liaoweng as a drunkard?" or ALT2:"... that a Chinese acting troupe was flogged for slander after they portrayed the thirteenth-century scholar Wei Liaoweng as a drunkard?"? Yunshui 雲水 09:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'd use numbers either way. There's also:
- Certainly could do. Do you prefer ALT1:"... that a thirteenth-century Chinese acting troupe was flogged for slander after they portrayed the scholar Wei Liaoweng as a drunkard?" or ALT2:"... that a Chinese acting troupe was flogged for slander after they portrayed the thirteenth-century scholar Wei Liaoweng as a drunkard?"? Yunshui 雲水 09:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- ALT3:"... that a Chinese acting troupe was flogged for slander in the 13th century after they portrayed the scholar Wei Liaoweng as a drunkard? Johnbod (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
