Template:Did you know nominations/When Björk Met Attenborough

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sven Manguard Wha? 16:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

When Björk Met Attenborough

edit

Created by Crikko (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 11:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC).

  • New enough and long enough. No copyvio or close paraphrasing found. There are no citations in the lengthy Synopsis section, but I'm unclear if that is an issue. As for the hooks, I don't like the word "celebrities". How about simply replacing "the two celebrities" with "them"? As for ALT1, how about "that in the documentary When Björk Met Attenborough, it is revealed that they have long been fans of each other's work?" I prefer ALT1, but as far as I can see the "fans" bit lacks an inline citation. By the way, I've seen the documentary and I enjoyed this article. Edwardx (talk) 10:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
  • I've not seen synopses or plots with inline citations - "them" is fine by me. The fans bit is written as "admired" in the article and supported by footnote 6. I sorta like it more but either is fine. Happy to leave it to you. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:52, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for clarifying my (unfounded) synopsis concern. I think that I must have searched for "fan" and missed out on "admired". My preference is also for ALT1, and I'm happy to keep your original ALT1 hook wording. Edwardx (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)