- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
William Goebel
Improved to Good Article status by Kavyansh.Singh (talk). Self-nominated at 19:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
Overall: Looks good! Small issue with a missing citation should be easily resolved, at which point this is good to go. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- @GorillaWarfare – Thanks for the review. I have added a citation. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've marked this as passed. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 06:43, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Modified ALT0 to T:DYK/P6 without image