Template:Did you know nominations/Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 16:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century
- ...
that one reviewer for the book Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century was concerned by the book's lack of poetry?Source: Source: [1] - "Although the volume contains various genres, including notes and parts of epistolary novels, it does not, as Nassar and Gjesdal note, contain either poetry, dramas, or letters. As stated earlier, it is the nature of any volume that seeks to cover a period that it cannot do justice to the full variety of thinkers and ideas that fluctuated around a specific time; something is always left out. It would, however, in this case, have been rather interesting to get an insight into the very materiality of (some) women’s philosophy; material in the sense of the different formats that their ideas took. This would also have granted further insights into how philosophical ideas alter when published in letters, novels, or treatises."
Created by Freedom4U (talk). Self-nominated at 05:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
New enough, long enough, neutral, well-cited (summary presumably sourced to the book itself), earwig only picks up quotes and titles, no close paraphrasing, QPQ done. The hook could use some improvement – I like the underlying idea, but repeating "the book" twice is clunky, and I don't know if "concerned" is supported by the source; the reviewer merely says "it would have been rather interesting" if such formats were included. – Teratix ₵ 03:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Teratix: Thanks for the review. Would the following hook be better?
- ALT1 ... that one reviewer for Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century was let down by the book's lack of poetry?
