Template:GABox

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage

Horizontal layout:

{{subst:GABox|1a=|1b=|2a=|2b=|2c=|2d=|3a=|3b=|4=|5=|6a=|6b=|7=}}

Vertical layout:

{{subst:GABox
|1a=
|1b=
|2a=
|2b=
|2c=
|2d=
|3a=
|3b=
|4=
|5=
|6a=
|6b=
|7=
}}

Available arguments are the following; any other argument or no argument at all gives an undecided mark. Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.

TemplateData

This is the TemplateData for this template used by TemplateWizard, VisualEditor and other tools. See a monthly parameter usage report for Template:GABox in articles based on its TemplateData.

TemplateData for GABox

Review template for Good Article nominees

Template parameters[Edit template data]

This template prefers inline formatting of parameters.

Parameter		Description	Type	Status
Criterion 1a	1a	Well written; the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 1b	1b	Well written; the article complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 2a	2a	Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 2b	2b	Verifiable with no original research: all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 2c	2c	Verifiable with no original research: the article contains no original research Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 2d	2d	Verifiable with no original research: the article contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 3a	3a	Broad in its coverage: the article addresses the main aspects of the topic Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 3b	3b	Broad in its coverage: the article stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 4	4	Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 5	5	Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 6a	6a	Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Criterion 6b	6b	Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested
Overall status	7	Overall status of the article being reviewed Suggested values yes no ? wtf hold neu	String	suggested

• y, yes, pass, good, ok, k, +, aye all produce a pass symbol:
• n, no, fail, bad, nk, -, nay all produce a fail symbol:
• ?, ??, ???, dunno, question, huh all produce a question symbol:
• wtf produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol:
• hold and on hold produce the on hold symbol:
• neu, neutral and und produce the neutral symbol:
• blank or no input produces the unassessed symbol

The above documentation is transcluded from Template:GABox/doc. (edit | history)
Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages.
Add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template.