This is an archive of a previous GA nomination. The results of the nomination were that the article has {{{status}}}ed the Good article criteria. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you disagree with this article's review, the article can be nominated for Good article reassessment. |
Usage
This template may be placed at the top of Good article review pages to provide a summary of the GA review status, as well as to signify that the page is an archive of a previous review and should not be edited. The template also adds reviews to Category:Good article reviews.
The syntax is as follows:
{{GAarchive|status=}}
The status parameter is either set to "pass" or "fail" by reviewers to indicate the final status of the article. The template will change appearance as shown below:
{{GAarchive|status=pass}}
yields:
This is an archive of a previous GA nomination. The results of the nomination were that the article has passed the Good article criteria. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you disagree with this article's review, the article can be nominated for Good article reassessment. |
{{GAarchive|status=fail}}
yields:
This is an archive of a previous GA nomination. The results of the nomination were that the article has failed the Good article criteria. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you disagree with this article's review, the article can be nominated for Good article reassessment. |
{{GAarchive|status=}}
yields:
This is an archive of a previous GA nomination. The results of the nomination were that the article has ed the Good article criteria. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you disagree with this article's review, the article can be nominated for Good article reassessment. |
See also
- {{talkarchive}}