Discussion at Wikipedia talk:IRC help disclaimer § Switch default IRC web client

edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:IRC help disclaimer § Switch default IRC web client. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
00:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

What if something goes wrong?🤨

edit
 
If a draft on Wikipedia can’t AfC submit

well what if something goes wrong with submitting? Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You ask for help. Primefac (talk) 22:41, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
👍🏻 Atlas Þə Biologist (talk) 22:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 18 November 2024

edit

Description of suggested change: The text of the link to the notability criteria in the web declination statement states it links to the notability criteria for websites. But, this declination statement and the linked WP:NWEB guideline is used for all web-based content, not just websites. The updated text should reduce confusion when declining a submission that is web-based but not a website.

Diff:

This submission's references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'']], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|''secondary'']] sources that are ''[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]'' of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|guidelines on the notability of websites]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing for beginners|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
+
This submission's references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'']], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|''secondary'']] sources that are ''[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]'' of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (web)|guidelines on the notability of web content]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing for beginners|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

cyberdog958Talk 09:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 10:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 20 November 2024

edit

Description of suggested change: Implement the ai/llm decline message currently in Template:AfC submission/comments/sandbox, per consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#Current draft text.

Diff:

+
|ai|llm = Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a [[large language model]], such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:<br /> * [[WP:NOTPROMO|Promotional tone]], [[MOS:EDITORIAL|editorializing]], and other [[WP:WTW|words to watch]] * [[WP:VAGUE|Vague]], generic, and [[WP:CRYSTAL|speculative statements]] extrapolated from similar subjects * [[WP:NOTESSAY|Essay-like writing]] * [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|Hallucinations]] (plausible-sounding, but false information) and [[WP:FAKE|non-existent references]] * [[WP:Close paraphrasing|Close paraphrasing]]<br /> Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See [[Wikipedia:Large language models|our help page on large language models]].

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I submitted a ticket in AfC helper to support this option Ca talk to me! 06:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Made a pull request for it, it should be reviewed soon! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template-protected edit request on 3 December 2024

edit

In the "Where to get help" section should the suggestion to go to the "AfC Help Desk" be a link to the actual help desk page? KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done normally, maybe - but in this case there is a link to a wizard for that page and the goal is to get new users to use that wizard instead of trying to use the editor to add their question. — xaosflux Talk 14:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply