This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I edited the diagram and left a comment "formatting; <small> tags removed; comments moved to next column has same effect". Kevin Steinhardt (talk·contribs) reverted this edit – taking out some corrections and additions as well as the formatting – with the comment: "To be honest, it has a negative effect on the RDT."
Many main lines use similar formatting, including Cornish Main Line, Reading to Plymouth Line, West of England Main Line. While there are a few routes that do not follow the style, these seem to be those that only list stations in their diagram, and have not been expanded to include other infrastructure. There is even an example on the WP:TRAIL page that governs the use of these diagrams.
In my opinion, the diagrams that have been extended to include infrastrucure need to have distinctive and consistent formatting to help identify the different items shown; it certainly does not have "a negative effect on the RDT" Geof Sheppard (talk) 12:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
