Template talk:British and Irish Lions 1989
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Wasps FC in topic Template format change proposal
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Aware of the fact that the Irish didn't get named acknowledgement until much later, but it seemed there was a demand for the consistency in the name from somewhere, don't recall when or where though, but still followed it blindly.Londo06 07:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Template format change proposal
editThis template does not follow the format of the other Lions tour navbox templates. I propose to change it to be consistent with them. noq (talk) 19:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'll fix the issue over the coming days.Londo06 11:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Why did you undo the fix if you intend to put it back "over the coming days"? noq (talk) 13:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- I do intend to remedy the problem over the coming days, it isn't something that will be fixed this afternoon though.Londo06 13:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- But why did you revert the fix that was already in place? noq (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- If you are talking to me, then you are conversing with the person who reinstated the fix for this template. I don't know if there is talk carried over from another page, but I had moved the page back to its correct version.Londo06 17:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- What was wrong with the change? It made it consistent with every other Lions tour navbox. Now it is different. Why is the different version right and the consistent version wrong? noq (talk) 18:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- If there is a template standard in place, surely this one falls under the international standard? Wasps FC (talk) 10:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- What was wrong with the change? It made it consistent with every other Lions tour navbox. Now it is different. Why is the different version right and the consistent version wrong? noq (talk) 18:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- If you are talking to me, then you are conversing with the person who reinstated the fix for this template. I don't know if there is talk carried over from another page, but I had moved the page back to its correct version.Londo06 17:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- But why did you revert the fix that was already in place? noq (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- I do intend to remedy the problem over the coming days, it isn't something that will be fixed this afternoon though.Londo06 13:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC)