Template talk:Cfd top
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Pppery in topic Template-protected edit request on 9 September 2023
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | Template:Cfd top is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Bg color
editMaybe it's just me, but the background color of this box seems a bit too bright. --cesarb 15:16, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I agree. It's also misworded: This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the category below actually deals with the debate about the category listed above. Grutness...wha? 01:45, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
documentation addition
editWas this really needed? Considering there is no documentation? Just wondering. --Kbdank71 19:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 9 September 2023
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the background colour from #bff9fc to #caf0f2 for a subtler, less gaudy colouration. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- You should probably seek input from/notify WT:CFD. bff9fc -> caf0f2 . SWinxy (talk) 15:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- Deactivating edit request pending discussion (and that discussion has lots of admins/TPERs watching who can do this themsleves). * Pppery * it has begun... 18:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)