Template talk:Christian denominations in Canada
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | This template should be converted to a standardized format using Template:Sidebar. (Talk • Category) |
(diff)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zackmann08 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
@Tahc: first of all, no major change was made... all that was done was to tag the page as needing to be converted. Second of all, you rationale for reverting the change makes zero sense. The template can absolutely be converted and still work within the necessary template. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- I am sorry I did not word the edit summary better, but wish to prevent in advance the template being broken later.
- Your view that it can converted be seems very unconvincing, since you (1) are clearly unfamiliar with any of the many templates involved and (2) cite no links, etc., that could show otherwise. tahc chat 09:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Tahc: well I actually know quite a lot about templates as I have more than 4 times the number of edits that you do. All you need to do is look at Template:Christian denominations in the United Kingdom to see that this works. But it is fine. Rather than tagging the pages I'm going to just go ahead and convert them. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- That appears that it will work.
- If you are an experienced Wikipedia editor, however, you should already know better that to (1) make edits without useful edit summaries or (2) make controversial changes without discussion and consensus. tahc chat 02:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Tahc: I posted a very clear edit summary that I was tagging the page and Simply tagging a page is not controversial just because you don't like it. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- No that is exactly what controversial means. Controversial means others do not agree to it yet. You made and remade the edit, without a discussion, even after you knew it was controversial.
- Your "clear" edit summaries cited no consensus anywhere for conversions, or even a possible reason, and cited no explanations for how it could be done. And since you had only tagged some of the involved templates you seem to have been unaware of how any of them fit together. tahc chat 02:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Create sandbox
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can a logged-in editor press the "mirror" or "create" link on the Template Documentation area to create a sandbox version of this template? (press the link, then press publish changes; it will mirror the template to Template:Christian denominations in Canada/sandbox) -- 70.51.45.46 (talk) 00:18, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
