The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Ric Converse

edit

Created/expanded by 72.74.216.217 (talk). Self nom at 03:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

  • New enough and long enough at time of nomination. Fully supported by inline citations. Article has no images requiring a copyright check. Article is neutral enough and contains no BLP errors that I can spot. Spot check for plagiarism and don't see anything obvious. Hook is supported by inline citations and one I think WP:RS supports this.
  • Some sources I do not think are reliable, including blogspot. One hook source is sourced to blogspot. --LauraHale (talk) 07:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Fix sourcing problems. --LauraHale (talk) 07:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


  • The blogspot source in question (citation #1) is Ric Converse's official website. 71.184.40.64 (talk) 19:40, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Based on reasoning above, will give tick. --LauraHale (talk) 06:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

}}