Template talk:Disability navbox

Discussion of this template copied from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disability#template_reactions_by_WP:MED

High importance and Mid importance are not good classifications and would be high maintenance. Suggest better ones, thanks. Hordaland (talk) 14:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree that Importance is not a good way to sort them - I think we could use "themes" such as:

Rights and law - (Articles about UN conventions, ADA, etc.)

Social issues - (Articles about Inclusion, Special education, Sport, etc.)

Medical issues - (Articles about Diseases and conditions that lead to disability)

Technology - (Articles about wheelchairs, hearing aids, etc.)

and so on. Roger (talk) 16:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)