Template talk:Dollhouse

Structure

anyone got experience with structuring such a thing? Wiesengrund (talk) 03:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Relevance

Is it necessary to have a structure up for this yet? The show hasn't even started, and there's no guarantee that the show will even be picked up. Just because something is created by Joss Wheadon doesn't make it instantly important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.47.187.170 (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

the show was picked up for 7 episodes at first, which became a full 13 episodes order afterwards. so basically the "worst case" we have here is something like Firefly. --Wiesengrund (talk) 08:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

To be fair, Firefly's really only important because of its strong fan following, there's no guarantee that Dollhouse will have anywhere near such a devoted following. Plus nearly every linked article in the structure hasn't even been written. In addition, the being picked up for 13 episodes thing is kind a weak argument: Fringe was picked up for an entire season and it doesn't have a structure. Just because Joss Wheadon wrote it doesn't mean its automatically gold (not yet anyway).

Recent Changes

I have manually reverted to a template to 02:42, 17 January 2010 by Falcor84, due to intermediate edits which did not now allow me the normal undo procedure. In any case, recent links added to the to this template should either link to the main article page or at the very least link to DIRECTLY to their respective targets on either the episode page or the characters page. Please see Help:Wiki_markup#link-to-section. If a revert is made, please ensure these changes are made. It is unacceptable for every link in the template to link to the same page without directly linking to their targets. Meowies (talk) 04:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)