Template talk:Emblem table

What might be quite helpful to those related but not legally recognized, if the family would have a variation of the coat of arms as a sort of clan member version, as is done with other houses of royalty & nobility throughout the UK & other parts of the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stardust dragonryder (talk • contribs) 00:14, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Inappropriate design

The choice of the navbox design for an infobox template is inappropriate. It breaks with the expectations of users when confronted by something that looks like a navbox, and the layout isn't even that optimal for the expected content. This should be restyled to resemble a standard infobox. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 22:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

{{sofixit}} → ROUX ₪ 22:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, it could be fixed simply by redirecting to {{Infobox Coat of arms}} (my first thought), but I thought I'd bring it up here in case there was an obvious rationale for having this as a separate template which I'd missed. As the author, what was your impetus to create this template? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 23:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

A mere four years and eleven months later, this now uses standard wikitable styling. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Problem

I can't get the image to appear unless there is text placed in the "notes" section. Can someone fix this?--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Coronet

Can someone who knows what they're doing please include another section for the Coronet? At the moment this infobox in many female royals' articles describes her coronet as a crest, which it is not. Although many crests do incorporate coronets, particularly in the royal family, they are distinct parts of the achievement. See e.g. the Duke of Norfolk's arms, which includes a coronet and a crest-coronet. Opera hat (talk) 12:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

 Done → ROUX ₪ 20:26, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! Opera hat (talk) 20:32, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 17 September 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. On a related note, this move request seems malformed, but I'm not sure what the intended move location may have actually been. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

---

Template:Infobox coat of arms wide → Template:Infobox coat of arms wide/doc – Technical request after move of the very infobox. Chicbyaccident (talk) 18:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

• ✗ Fail That page already exists at Template:Infobox coat of arms wide/doc and serves a different purpose than the template itself. —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hidden

Why does this produce hidden content by default? Is there a way to force it not to be hidden? --Pontificalibus 11:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Tiny image on mobile

See for example Sophie, Countess of Wessex#Arms. The left column, with the CoA image, collapses to a ridiculously narrow width that's impossible to discern. Until someone improves it, I'm going to add a min-width:10px or thereabouts to that column. Hairy Dude (talk) 22:19, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 6 April 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Template:Emblem table buidhe 10:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

---

Template:Infobox emblem wide → Template:Emblem – More succinct. Not really an infobox? As such, there is no "template non-wide" that I am aware of (on a sidenote, perhaps the infobox contents of Template:Infobox emblem could be merged into it, but that is another discussion). PPEMES (talk) 09:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. buidhe 20:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose as proposed as the title would be ambiguous as there is also {{Infobox emblem}} as the nom points out. I agree also that the current name is bad, as the template is not an infobox and does not use that template. A possible name could be Template:Emblem table, or something of that sorts which describes what the template does. --Gonnym (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
• Support Template:Emblem table per Gonnym. It's not an infobox. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

I agree that to be at least an improvement. PPEMES (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Unwanted wiki code is displaying when we lack a badge image

In Patricia Scotland § Arms we have a badge description but no badge image. Thus badgeimage is blank and badge has a text value. This causes the display of some raw wikicode. Can anything be done about this? Pinging recent contributors @Ha2772a and Celia Homeford:. Thanks in advance for any help, MartinPoulter (talk) 11:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, that wikicode is over my head, I'm afraid. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

 Fixed ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)