Template talk:Excessive examples editnotice
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lennart97 in topic Requested move 22 June 2021
 | On 22 June 2021, it was proposed that this page be moved from Template:Example cruft editnotice to Template:Excessive examples editnotice. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 22 June 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 21:17, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Example cruft editnotice → Template:Excessive examples editnotice – "Cruft" is not a term that all editors know. Calling it Excessive examples makes it clearer what is made. The notice should be changed accordingly. This was brought up at Template talk:Example farm#Requested move 21 June 2021 where @JIP and Gonnym: have participated. --Trialpears (talk) 17:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom, pending successful outcome of the other RM at a more widely watched page; this is a reasonable simplification. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 17:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nominator, a clearer and more consistent term. JIP | Talk 17:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Emphatically. Words like "farm" and "cruft" are vague and subjective, and their usage in this context is considered slang. The proposed name is clearer and more consistent with the usage in other templates. — Johnnie Bob (talk) 17:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom, pending successful outcome of the other RM. Gonnym (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.