This template is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
@Hmlarson: That page seems outdated (the majority of edits are from 2006), and this is only a navbox, without any parameters. Why not just move the template so the revision history could be retained? S.A. Julio (talk) 03:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
That would be the brute force approach described in the article which results in breaks throughout the entire topic. I know from previous experience with a template that had far less links and usage and was easy to fix. Hmlarson (talk) 03:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
