New image
editI think 
looks a bit dull. Might I suggest using 
instead? - Lasse Havelund (p) (t) 15:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I think the first one is better—easier to discern. TONY (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with you when it's rendered at 20px, but try comparing the following two templates:
| | The grammar of this article or section needs to be improved. Please do so in accordance with Wikipedia's style guidelines. |
| | The grammar of this article or section needs to be improved. Please do so in accordance with Wikipedia's style guidelines. |
- — Lasse Havelund (p · t · c) 14:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Yup, the darker one is much better. TONY (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. More solid, better contrast. Waltham, The Duke of 15:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Back to the garish yellow one: why? TONY (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it appeared to be as part of the standardised ambox style, that's why I changed it, but if you disagree, undo it. It's just part of the standardisation. Steve Crossin (contact) 13:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Aaaah, that's MUCH better, back to the grey. I don't find it dull, actually. It's authoritative, and is nicely set off by the narrow yellow band to the left. Nice. TONY (talk) 06:34, 28 June 2008 (UTC)