Template talk:HTML editors
Latest comment: 4 years ago by GhostInTheMachine in topic Text HTML editors
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Text HTML editors
editPer HTML editor#Text editors, the bare minimum for something to be considered an HTML editor is syntax highlighting. Editors such as Scintilla, Notepad2, Notepad++, et al. should be included here for that reason.
--Gyrobo (talk) 14:17, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support! By all means go ahead and add them all. I agree. We have consensus; weep the tears of joy or something. (:LOL:) Fleet Command (talk) 16:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Our consensus was all of them; but you added only Scintilla-based. A lapse of memory, perhaps? Fleet Command (talk) 07:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Froala Editor's custom license definetly doesn't qualify as free software or open source. It should be removed from the open source section. --Pelle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.182.54.78 (talk) 18:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
My edit got reverted
editI tried to add Sublime Text to this template and it got removed. As Notepad2 and Sublime Text both have wikipedia pages, they should be added to this template. --desbest (talk) 22:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sublime is fine, just a minor technical issue with the edit itself, so added it again. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 22:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)