This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
I'll try to finish the zhuyin tomorrow. It took me a while to find a font that could display UTF-8 bopomofo extended characters (Unicode 3.0 or later)! If you would like to actually see the bopomofo extended characters, try downloading Code2000 true type font.
A-cai14:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
The Pumindian strikes me as unlikely: the letter el stands for [dz]?? bb stands for both [b] and [m]? There are several things like that that make me think this is at best a sloppy job, so we need a ref to verify it. kwami (talk) 17:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
See Talk:Taiwanese_Minnan#Update_on_Pumindian for an explanation of Pumindian, and the dictionary that it came from. The pronunciation in the dictionary favors the Xiamen pronunciation. Based on my memory, bb can be represented as [b] or [m], depending on the transliteration system (it really depends on the speaker). Unfortunately, I don't have my copy of that dictionary on hand at the moment, so it may be a while before I am able to consult it to verify that row. -- A-cai (talk) 21:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply