Template talk:Infobox US Supreme Court case
Template:Infobox US Supreme Court case is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Infobox US Supreme Court case template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This template is used to create infoboxes for United States Supreme Court cases. If you find yourself confused in how to use this template or need assistance, please feel free to leave comments on this page. |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Adding an "Opinion" parameter
editI've seen on many SCOTUS pages that they have an "Opinion" parameter and have attached the opinion posted from the SCOTUS website. I think it would be beneficial to have this parameter for the ease of adding the opinion, rather than having to go through making a new parameter. Pacamah (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Edit request 31 August 2023
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: According to Category:Pages using infobox US Supreme Court case with unknown parameters, the 'Statement' parameter is classified as unknown, despite the fact that it is defined in the infobox code and is used in multiple articles. This can be fixed by adding the Statement categories to the list of known parameters below.
Diff:
− | | JoinPlurality4 | LawsApplied | Litigants | Litigants2 | Litigants3 | Litigants4 | Litigants5 | Majority | Majority2 | Majority3 | NotParticipating | Opinion | OpinionAnnouncement | OralArgument | OralArguments | OralReargument | Outcome | Overruled | Overturned previous case | ParallelCitations | PerCuriam | Plurality | Plurality2 | Plurality3 | Plurality4 | Prior | Procedural | QuestionsPresented | ReargueDate | ReargueDate2 | ReargueDateA | ReargueDateA2 | ReargueDateB | ReargueDateB2 | ReargueYear | ReargueYear2 | Related | Seriatim | Seriatim2 | Seriatim3 | Seriatim4 | Seriatim5 | | + | | JoinPlurality4 | JoinStatement | JoinStatement2 | LawsApplied | Litigants | Litigants2 | Litigants3 | Litigants4 | Litigants5 | Majority | Majority2 | Majority3 | NotParticipating | Opinion | OpinionAnnouncement | OralArgument | OralArguments | OralReargument | Outcome | Overruled | Overturned previous case | ParallelCitations | PerCuriam | Plurality | Plurality2 | Plurality3 | Plurality4 | Prior | Procedural | QuestionsPresented | ReargueDate | ReargueDate2 | ReargueDateA | ReargueDateA2 | ReargueDateB | ReargueDateB2 | ReargueYear | ReargueYear2 | Related | Seriatim | Seriatim2 | Seriatim3 | Seriatim4 | Seriatim5 | SplitOpinion | Statement | Statement2 | SubmitDate |
Edit request 31 August 2023_2
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Simple redirect fix: now that John Marshall Harlan (born 1899) has been moved to John Marshall Harlan II, it would be beneficial for this template to incorporate the page move for each court Harlan served on. Diff:
− | [[John Marshall Harlan | + | [[John Marshall Harlan II|John M. Harlan II]] |
Politicsfan4 (talk) 03:18, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- This request is for Template:Infobox US Supreme Court case/courts. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 03:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Done Primefac (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Edit request 31 August 2023_3
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: More cleanup stuff: removing obsolete parameter (SplitOpinion), typo fix ("SubmitDatee" to "SubmitDate"), and fully incorporating the Statement parameter.
Diff:
− | | header21 = {{#if: | + | | header21 = {{#if:{{{Majority|}}}{{{Plurality|}}}{{{PerCuriam|}}}{{{Seriatim|}}}{{{Statement|}}}|Case opinion}}{{#if:{{{Majority2|}}}{{{Plurality2|}}}{{{PerCuriam2|}}}{{{Dissent|}}}{{{Concurrence|}}}{{{Concurrence/Dissent|}}}{{{Seriatim2|}}}|s}} |
− | | Seriatim5 | | + | | Seriatim5 | Statement | Statement2 | SubmitDate |
Politicsfan4 (talk) 18:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 20:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
error
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Turns out I was wrong and the "SplitOpinion" parameter is not obsolete and exists for a reason (for example Goldwater v. Carter, where |SplitOpinion=yes is supposed to shows the "Case opinion" header). Sorry, my mistake. Diff:
− | | header21 = {{#if: | + | | header21 = {{#if:{{{Majority|}}}{{{Plurality|}}}{{{PerCuriam|}}}{{{Seriatim|}}}{{{SplitOpinion|}}}{{{Statement|}}}|Case opinion}}{{#if:{{{Majority2|}}}{{{Plurality2|}}}{{{PerCuriam2|}}}{{{Dissent|}}}{{{Concurrence|}}}{{{Concurrence/Dissent|}}}{{{Seriatim2|}}}|s}} |
− | | Seriatim5 | Statement | Statement2 | SubmitDate | + | | Seriatim5 | SplitOpinion | Statement | Statement2 | SubmitDate |
Politicsfan4 (talk) 21:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Completed, and thank you for catching that! This infobox template is transcluded to thousands of pages, so it would be better if you were to add any future edits to the template's [sandbox] making sure that it is first synchronized with the live template. Then the changes can be tested using the [testcases] page – see WP:TESTCASES. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 22:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 2 July 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the three red
backgrounds to #B60000
(used for Superseded, Overruled, Abrogated)
Reasoning:
- MOS:CONTRAST: "Ensure the contrast of the text with its background reaches at least ... AA level, and AAA level when feasible"
- AAA is feasible when choosing template colors, and therefore required in order to meet the guideline
#FF0000
akared
fails even AA#B60000
is the lightest shade of pure red that passes AAA with white text (from Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Accessibility/Colors)
Thanks. Jruderman (talk) 03:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 04:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)