Template talk:Infobox fragrance

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Innisfree987 in topic Alternate version, or change the color?

Alternate version, or change the color?

edit

Hi! I don’t know if anyone’s reading this talk page but I’m wondering, as a total template noob, whether it’s possible to create an alternative version or even just adjust this one, to have a subtler color. The pink is very loud and while I think it’s a fun color, it overshadows some of the images of fragrances. Opinions anyone? Innisfree987 (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Using the sandbox and the MOS guidelines for color accessibility, I switched in a #FFE2E2, a more muted shade of pale pink/beige. You can check it out in the test case for this template. I personally find it distracts less from the bottle photo, but I am totally open to alternative options. Innisfree987 (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I do think a paler color noticeably improves legibility. Innisfree987 (talk) 20:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Now trying #FFE4C8, a more peach shade—perhaps more gender-neutral? Innisfree987 (talk) 14:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi Philoserf‬, I noticed that you had edited a couple fragrance pages recently (and I can’t find many others who have!), so in the interests of not altering everyone’s infoboxes unilaterally, I wanted to see if you had any reactions to the idea of changing the color (or the color bars could be removed entirely.) FWIW it does seem the current color is probably not up to snuff for accessibility (per MOS, it’s too dark for unclicked links to remain legible). Anyway, welcome your thoughts if you have any! Current draft is here: Template:Infobox_fragrance/testcases Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Greetings. I have a maintenance routine and many of the articles I visit are not in WikiProjects I focus upon. And, while I have some rudimentary template experience, I am not a specialist there. I doubt I would be helpful. Thanks for noticing my WP:GNOMEic presence innisfree987. —¿philoserf? (talk) 22:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Aha! Well extra thanks for gnoming outside your main interests Philoserf, much appreciated. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

No color?

edit

Now testing a version with the color removed. Ultimately I think this is probably preferable but it would require other adjustments to the formatting to work visually. Therefore my vote for now is to switch to the pale peach shade as a neutral option and consider a broader revision or a new template to make all the necessary adjustments to have a template without color bars. Innisfree987 (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I too, prefer no color. I trust your judgement on the path forward. —¿philoserf? (talk) 16:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Really appreciate your weighing in—yes the more I look at it, the more it seems like a clear improvement and even if further tweaks are needed, this is one to start with. I’m going to go ahead and implement and if it draws objection, well that’s one way to get more input! Ok here goes. Innisfree987 (talk) 01:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Perfumer

edit

Also is it possible to add a line for the perfumer (if known)? For example, Christine Nagel and Francis Kurkdjian are the credited noses on Narciso Rodriguez for Her, which seems worth putting in the infobox. Maybe also awards? Apologies if I should just be making these changes myself—I have the impression that with templates, I might actually break something! Thank you muchly. Innisfree987 (talk) 16:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok I think I have figured out how to add “perfumer” and also “awards” to the infobox without breaking anything. Let me know if any objections. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I am going to go ahead institute these because I believe it won’t change the appearance of existing pages, only add two more options for parameters. Innisfree987 (talk) 14:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply