This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
At the moment, the template seems suggesting, that all the type of Italian cheese included are DOP, but that is not the case. Should we not have two separated templates one for all Italian type of cheese and one for the DOP ones or could we include some distinction in the template for the two categories? --Dia^ (talk) 13:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have to say, I don't understand much how do templates work or their layout possibilities and I agree that as it was, was suboptimal but now there are some issues. For example mozzarella (that now is under PDO-section) per se is not PDO but mozzarella di bufala is. The same is for robiola: some varieties of robiola are PDO (although I'm not sure there is an article on ENwiki yet), some others not. I thought that grouping them together and than indicating the ones that are PDO would make for a simpler reading. But then all that "(PDO)" repeated umpteen times don't look too good either. Any other suggestion? --Dia^ (talk) 14:53, 7 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Just move the stuff around where it needs to go. Where there are cheeses that fall into both categories (PDO and unprotected varieties) but have only one article place them in the PDO section. As for multiple templates, that would be problematic, keeping them organized would be overly complicated. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!)13:47, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
