This template is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This template is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This template looks like it should have the attention of the editors associated with the Chinese Martial Arts Project. There are some nuanced and complicated issues associated with some of the content of this template that I feel unqualified to fully address. Junzi (talk) 23:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Bad template, not neutral. Biased selection of styles, without any sources. Seems to play with the Shaolin's myths, without historial serious references. The former title "kung fu styles" shows the lack of consistency... Let's take a look at List of Chinese martial arts and the Chinese martial art article to learn a bit...
That template must be deleted, to my point of view. A template "Chinese animal styles" may be usefull (if such a distinction is not POV or a sort of original work...), but not this actual David Carradine's explanation ! --Irønie (talk) 17:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps this template could be merged with the Chinese martial Arts template?
If that solution is not possible or practical, then I would concur that deletion is the ideal solution for this template. Junzi (talk) 20:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
