Template talk:Lady Gaga/Archive 1

Archive 1

Fix El Mistakeos Please

Since I'm not established enough to do it, can someone put Video Phone back in featured singles? And uh, that other featured single that's apparently upcoming. Thanks. --Benchilla (talk) 03:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Done some time ago. SunCreator (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

The Remix EP

i made a page for The Remix, the Lady Gaga EP so if someone could change it to a link on the template.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussiemonster (talk • contribs) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Without notability and also being WP:CRYSTALBALL I don't think that is appropriate. Commented on you talk page. SunCreator (talk) 01:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

if you use google translate, you can actually view the tracklisting :)--110.175.56.28 (talk) 01:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

X-Posed

There's an album coming out on March 9 that is a collection of interviews. It's called Lady Gaga: X-Posed. could this be posted anywhere? http://www.walmart.com/ip/13339119 --Sdoo493 (talk) 19:38, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

No. Its a bootleg. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Singles split

I think it's time to spin-off the navbox by creating a singles navbox. Any thoughts? Imperatore (talk) 20:37, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I made a singles navbox. What do you think?

User:Ilikeriri/Template:Lady Gaga singles Ilikeriri (talk) 18:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

The Cherrytree Sessions

um...i don't really know how to use wikipedia editing, but i think the article for the cherrytree sessions should be put back up. it was released and it can be purchased on her official website. [[1]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanroxursox (talk • contribs) 10:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

No. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:15, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

do you mind if i ask why? comment added by Seanroxursox (talk —Preceding undated comment added 22:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC).

There is no third party notability of the EP, no reviews, no commercial reception etc. Hence it fails Notability in Wikipedia. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:02, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

the cherrytree sessions were just released on cd on august 3 on interscope/konlive/cherrytree/streamline records, so somebody should add it to the template. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.169.142.121 (talk) 22:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from BaleiaMariahQueijo, 30 May 2010

{{editsemiprotected}}

New Single Dance In The Dark It's Not Between the singles BaleiaMariahQueijo (talk) 22:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.--mono 23:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

NEW ALBUM TITLE. "BORN THIS WAY"

lady gaga had promised that if she won video of the year at the 2010 VMAS, she would reveal the album title. and she did. its called "Born this way" and she sang a portion of the title song.

sources: http://www.mtv.com/videos/misc/559096/lady-gaga-wins-video-of-the-year-announces-new-album-title.jhtml#id=1647212 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.129.177.194 (talk) 07:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Sit down. Its already added to the article. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Kirky2345, 13 September 2010

{{edit semi-protected}}

Kirky2345 (talk) 19:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Question:You have to be more specific with your request, not only giving the edit but also explaining it. Here, you seem to have changed the template to link Born This Way, which only redirects to a section of the main Lady Gaga article, whereas all of the other entries have articles. Intelligentsium 21:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed.--I agree with Intelligentsium, as well as the fact it is already mentioned, normally articles are not made until CD's are released or pre-release parties happen giving full details. Possiably we can just place the text with no link and place the release date, we need a consensus for that though. Thanks.--Wolfnix • Talk • 22:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC) If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page.

Note: Per WP:NAVBOX, "Unlinked text should be avoided. For example, {{Axis of Justice}} lists non-articles under 'Notable guests', but this content seems more appropriate in an article.", id est, until the album article is created, no link, please. Yvesnimmo (talk) 23:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Not done: It was a suggestion, as I was unsure. Until next time gadget. --Wolfnix • Talk • 23:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC) {{subst:Wolfnix/toolbox/tb}}

Born This Way Addition

Born This Way is already featured on gaga's main page and the fame chronology, shouldnt it be added to the template? PinkFunhouse13 (talk) 22:13, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

No, because it doesn't have an article. Yves (talk) 22:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

There is now an article, added it to template PinkFunhouse13 (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

I still think it was extremely premature of you to move the incubator article. Extremely. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

The Fame Monster is it's own album.

I think The Fame Monster should be in the studio albums list because Gaga stated that The Fame Monster was its own album and not just an EP! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.145.163 (talk) 00:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Read the article. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 00:35, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Video Phone

Where did Video Phone go? Stephenjamesx (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

No idea. Readded. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

New template style

I switched the template to this new, easier to edit, list design that I've seen around recently. I don't anticipate any objections to the change, but as this is a highly watched navigational template, I thought I'd leave a note here. Acalamari 17:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Acalamari! This makes editing much easier for new and experienced editors alike. :) —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 18:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Wow... thanks a lot Acalamari. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Merge & collapse

I merged the separate singles table included on the template into the table, making this one table/template rather than two. I also added code to make the template automatically collapsed (due to its size) unless it is added to pages as: {{Lady Gaga|state=expanded}}</ref>. ~~~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyacinth (talk • contribs) 13:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

American Horror Story: Hotel

I added American Horror Story: Hotel to the navbox but my edit was reverted. Should this entry be included? I realize we don't normally include acting roles in navboxes for actors, but acting is not Gaga's primary role and she is a major character in this upcoming series. Surely this role is part of her career and one worth noting in any bio about her. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Of course its relevant..its directly related to the topic at hand. Why would we exclude this one link because of some projects POV on navboxes devoted to films....no policy or guideline saying films should never be listed in navboxes. As has been mentioned in the past many many many times and is policy...what to include in a navboxe should be discussed per case.....there is no blanket rule as has been implied by the edit summary that no film can be listed ever. Best we leave this type of decision up to content editors of the project at hand. --Moxy (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Concur with Moxy. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Moxy seems to be ignoring prior consensus and giving their own interpretation, despite having had it pointed out several times by several editors. A severe case of WP:IDHT. We do not have actor filmographies in navboxes. Period. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

It absolutely should not be included, due to the enormous amount of prior consensus regarding filmographies in navboxes. Additionally, it gives her WP:UNDUE weight if we were to include at the bottom of ethe article page. None of the other actors get a navbox included, why should she? --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Just one link to a policy or guideline...stop with the BS... in other words stop going around saying consensus ...there is no consensus that movies are never to be included....its just disruptive. What makes you think that you can tell other projects what they can do? Stop the edit-wars..start to be more productive. Stop wasting content editors time. -- Moxy (talk) 15:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Again? HERE is where the long-standing consensus is documented. If you don't like it, seek to change the consensus, don't ignore it. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)