This template is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
Template:Malheur National Wildlife Refuge is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
I think we should eliminate the "Occupation" section and replace it with a "Related" section with links to the occupation article and timeline. The other entries are related to the occupation, and therefore the wildlife refuge (once removed), but IMO they are not specifically related to the refuge or worthy of inclusion in the navbox. If we included groups/people in the navboxes of every activity and event in which they are involved, navboxes would be out of control. ---Another Believer(Talk)15:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
This template is sort of a continuation of the deleted category, and can serve as easy navigation among articles related to the refuge itself and to the occupation. Since there aren't many articles related to the occupation (main, timeline, Bundy, Ritzheimer, Ward, and Finicum) they can be included in the bottom "Occupation" section, with the current layout. MB298 (talk) 00:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
I agree with MB298. All of these articles are notable enough to warrant links in the template. I don't understand why they were deleted in the first place. Parsley Man (talk) 00:45, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply