Template talk:Move review
![]() | This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Template:Move review talk Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Template talk:Move review talk Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
![]() | This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Days at Template:MRVdiscuss
editI think you might have figured it out by now, but days is a partial hack around for the fact that #time does not recognize that "YYYY Month Day" format used by template. It only excepts dates in the format supported by php's strtotime function. It does handle YYYY Month though, and by adding days it treats the date as adding that many days from the start of the month. Which is why the template currently bugs on the last day of the month. Hmm I wonder what would happen if minutes got used instead {{#time:Y M|2013 January 31 minutes}} yields "2013 Jan", vs {{#time:Y M|2013 January 31 days}} which yields "2013 Feb". Going to switch it to minutes. PaleAqua (talk) 02:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I moved this here from my talk page so that anyone wondering why "minutes" is there can check here for the answer. Wbm1058 (talk) 16:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- I believe a similar fix still needs to be made in this template as well. Wbm1058 (talk) 16:49, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Deprecated
editI have tagged this as deprecated. RM discussions go to Move Review, and they are on the talk pages. Tag the RM discussion, not the article. Similarly for other namespace pages, although there is no issue of disruption to readers. See discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Move_review#Move_Review_tag. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)