Template talk:MultiLicenseWithCC-By-All
CC 2.5 and 3.0?
editI got this request on my talk page. That got me thinking whether we should include Creative Commons 2.5 and 3.0 into this template. Please comment. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ignore this. I found {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Future}}. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 01:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Incompatible?
editIs it even possible to dual-license under cc-by-nd cc-by-nc and GFDL? They're not compatible with each other, so how come? --87.52.31.106 14:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- The person reusing can choose which license to use. They'd presumably choose one that is compatible with the project they intend to use it in. Reach Out to the Truth 19:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Wikimedia licensing update
edit{{editprotected}} Please replace the text under the [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GFDL] in this template with under [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's copyright terms]], per meta:Licensing update/Result. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 11:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 26 July 2021
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request that this template be moved to Category:Wikipedia copyright templates. It doesn't belong in Category:Copyright user templates it should only be for userboxes. Catfurball (talk) 18:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Edit request for dark mode improvements
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the dark mode improvements from Template:MultiLicenseWithCC-By-All/sandbox in the main template. Waqar💬 18:23, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Partly done: I've made the template compatible with darkmode, however, I have opted to not use your changes since they result in a significant visual difference in the appearance to the template Sohom (talk) 13:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
