This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nuclide template. |
|
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Seems that there is no talk page for this? There is a Tfm for {{nuclide}} and {{nuclide2}}. Does anyone here even notice? Since this one transcludes {{nuclide2}}, seems to me that instead of merging, we could just propose {{nuclide}} for deletion. That means that all the uses of this one should be change to {{nuclide2}} before the deletion. Putting the TFM notice in the templates really messes up tables that they are use in. That should encourage users of this one to change. Gah4 (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- In case anyone doesn't know, this template transcludes {{nuclide2}}. There is a merge proposal, but it doesn't seem to me what is really needed. There is nothing wrong with {{nuclide2}}, so it makes more sense just to delete this one. Before that can be done, someone (or someones) need to change all the articles that use this one. If a bot can do that, it should be pretty easy. It takes some work for a person. The tables I use {{nuclide2}} in are program generated, so it isn't so hard to change, but then again they don't need changing. I suppose there are some that really need merging, but in many cases it is more work than it is worth. Gah4 (talk) 22:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- I'm the guy that created this template and Nuclide2. I created the later because this one had some problems that were hard to fix without changing the arguments, which would break existing use of the template. I had already use this template on too many pages to change it manually and I didn't have a bot to automatically change it. So, I created a new template and put a large notice on this, the old one, not to use it. I also asked this template to be deleted at some point, which now might finally be happening (yay!). I think it's almost ten years overdue...
- There is no reason for the Nuclide2 template to have a "2" in its name other than the above history. Once Nuclide is gone, Nuclide2 should be renamed. For all intents and purposes, this is the same as merging them.
- This page is not the right place for a discussion; the tfm page is where you should voice your opinion about it, as that's where the decision will be made. — SkyLined (talk) 23:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes I agree, and will continue there. I put this one here, just in case someone only reads it here. Gah4 (talk) 02:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Testing
editTest of this template: 1
1H
4
2He
7
3Li
9
4Be
11
5B
12
6C
14
7N
16
8O
19
9F
20
10Ne
23
11Na
24
12Mg
27
13Al
28
14Si
31
15P
33
16S
35
17Cl
40
18Ar
39
19K
40
20Ca
45
21Sc
48
22Ti
51
23V
52
24Cr
55
25Mn
56
26Fe
59
27Co
58
28Ni
63
29Cu
64
30Zn
69
31Ga
74
32Ge
75
33As
80
34Se
79
35Br
84
36Kr
85
37Rb
88
38Sr
89
39Y
90
40Zr
93
41Nb
98
42Mo
99
43Tc
102
44Ru
103
45Rh
106
46Pd
107
47Ag
114
48Cd
115
49In
118
50Sn
121
51Sb
130
52Te
127
53I
132
54Xe
133
55Cs
138
56Ba
139
57La
140
58Ce
141
59Pr
142
60Nd
145
61Pm
152
62Sm
153
63Eu
158
64Gd
159
65Tb
164
66Dy
165
67Ho
166
68Er
169
69Tm
174
70Yb
175
71Lu
178
72Hf
181
73Ta
184
74W
187
75Re
192
76Os
193
77Ir
195
78Pt
197
79Au
202
80Hg
205
81Tl
208
82Pb
209
83Bi
210
84Po
210
85At
222
86Rn
223
87Fr
226
88Ra
227
89Ac
232
90Th
231
91Pa
238
92U
237
93Np
244
94Pu
243
95Am
247
96Cm
247
97Bk
251
98Cf
252
99Es
257
100Fm
258
101Md
259
102No
262
103Lr
261
104Rf
262
105Db
266
106Sg
264
107Bh
277
108Hs
268
109Mt
281
110Ds
272
111Rg
285
112Cn
The element Uut does not exist. 289
114Fl
The element Uup does not exist. 292
116Lv
The element Uus does not exist. The element Uuo does not exist.
Gah4 (talk) 00:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
What Links Here
editSpecial:WhatLinksHere/Template:Nuclide Gah4 (talk) 05:16, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
DigitsInNumber
editTemplate {{DigitsInNumber}} is used but does not exist. --Obsuser (talk) 05:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- FWIW it was deleted 03:16, 27 May 2008, so this does not appear to cause much problems. - SkyLined — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.45.178.169 (talk)