This template is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This template is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
In the real world, property owned or leased by PANYNJ is important. That articles for part of the agency's mission/activities do not exist in Wikipedia is not a reason for non-inclusion in a navigation template, since the encyclopedia should strive to be complete. Accordingly added. The choice to red link them is debatable. References:
Well, there's only the three cruise terminals that really count as passenger ports. But, add them. There's no reason not to as long as they're actually Port Authority facilities. I don't think the Manhattan Cruise Terminal actually is a PANYNJ facility. oknazevad (talk) 13:55, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
FYI, Brooklyn Cruise Terminal and Manhattan Cruise Terminal are both connected to the "NYCruise" website, which convinces me they're owned by the same company -- neither of which are connected to the Port Authority. In fact their website says " NYCruise is managed by NYCEDC" at the bottom. Cape Liberty has it's own website, which also has no connection to PANYNJ. I'm starting to wonder if I made a big mistake. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
By the three I meant Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Bayonne. From what I can gather Bayonne is owned by the PANYNJ, who hire their own contract operator, while Brooklyn is owned by the PA, but leased to the city, so that they can have a joint contract with the operations of the Manhattan terminal, which the city owns outright. oknazevad (talk) 17:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Category:Port Authority of New York and New Jersey people is quite populated, so the random addition of some names to the template seems arbitrary. Was there criteria for inclusion? Even limited addition say of chairpersons and/or executive directors would overwhelm the facilities/projects navbox. Not sure there's a PANYNJ people nav-box needed, but would not opppose it. Djflem (talk) 14:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
You are better at this than me. I defer to you. I appreciate your knowledge. Hope you enjoy your day. But to share, my criteria was important folks from my studies like Austin tobin, etc, and then just inform people that there are individuals not just rail beds, buildings, docks, etc. it has to be run by quality people, but i agree it has too much information already. Joco179 (talk) 15:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply