Template talk:PAVE US

RfC: Pave Mint link

The PAVE Mint link on the template points to the PAVE § PAVE systems article section which only lists the Pave Mint with a red-link. The link in the template should be made a red-link by removing the piped link to the PAVE article. I could do it myself, but wanted some discussion first. — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 02:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Then have some discussion. Thanks for thinking of others first, but I've commented out the Rfc header, as this fails WP:RFCBEFORE, and is wasteful of editor resources to run for a month; just discuss it. Or WP:BE BOLD, make the change, and see if anyone complains. Mathglot (talk) 04:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I've unpiped the link turning it red per your analysis, which I think is the right one. If others object, feel free to revert, and let us know why you think it is better as a blue link which points to a section which does not have any content about PAVE Mint. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Red links

Another question... Per WP:EXISTING, should this navbox have so many reed links? How quickly are the missing articles being added? — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 23:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)