Template talk:Pathology

Opinions about splitting some content?

Hi all, what would the opinions be about branching some of the content off this template? I think this section should be moved to a separate template:

• Cellular adaptation

  Atrophy

  Hypertrophy

  Hyperplasia

  Dysplasia

  Metaplasia

  Squamous

  Glandular

  Cell death

  Necrosis

  Coagulative necrosis

  Liquefactive necrosis

  Gangrenous necrosis

  Caseous necrosis

  Fat necrosis

  Fibrinoid necrosis

  Myocytolysis

  Programmed cell death

  Apoptosis

  Pyknosis

  Karyorrhexis

  Karyolysis

The reason is that it stands out like a sore thumb amongst the rest of this template, which is much more general in form, describing pathology and subspecialities. The content above really relates to either General histopathology findings or Cellular pathophysiology . I'm sure there are better titles to both but I hope I convey my point - these relate to the responses of cells to stress or injury and are better placed in a separate template. That template can also include some additional helpful links like fibrosis etc. So, to summarise my two questions are:

1. Should this content be split into a more appropriate template
2. If so, what would be the best name for that template? (Ideally a name accessible to as many readers as possible) --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Ping to Spicy who may have an opinion here. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)