 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
More stakes
editUnder former and defunct JVs and shareholdings, shouldn't we list the following companies?
- PolyGram (initially a JV, jointly owned with Siemens, later a 100% daughter)
- Navteq
- TSMC
- Grundig
- B&O
- Marantz
The Seventh Taylor (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sure, why not.Rangoon11 (talk) 00:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
B&O
edituser:R'n'B wrote: there is nothing in either the Philips or Bang & Olufsen articles documenting any joint venture or ownership relation between the two companies.
- You may be right here. I also cannot find evidence of it elsewhere, other than a "strategic alliance" which apparently involved a temporary flow of money from Philips to B&O. [1] The Seventh Taylor (talk) 04:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Overstyling
editI have fixed the overstyling per WP:DEVIATIONS and to match the format used by Template:Siemens and all the others. Frietjes (talk) 21:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)