Template talk:Pic of the day

[Untitled]

If this is going to be used, it should probably be protected because people could otherwise do really naughty things with it.--Eloquence*

Was there a reason you switched the layout to be wider? I liked this version. Having it more vertical would allow it to be put in a table with something else on the side of it. My talk page for example looks fairly bad on an 800*600 screen as I want the picture to the right of the intro text. Angela. 21:04, May 14, 2004 (UTC)

On my user page it's the exact opposite - in vertical form it clashes with the table. I'll try to figure out if the positioning can be done outside the MediaWiki text, so that the person using the text can decide how it should look.--Eloquence*

Would it be best to keep an archive, or just to bold the ones that have been used in Wikipedia:Featured pictures? Something should be done to prevent the same being repeated. Perhaps just a list on a subpage would be enough?

I'm in favor of bolding on FP because I think the procedures should be the same for both pages.--Eloquence*

Ok, I've done this for the four that have featured so far. Angela. 07:28, May 17, 2004 (UTC)

Then again, featured pictures do keep an archive as well as bolding. I think it could be useful to have a visual record to help with choosing the next day's picture to make sure you don't get a string of very similar images used over a short period. I've created one at Template:Pic of the day/Archive. Angela. 04:42, May 21, 2004 (UTC)

I agree that the FA block should stay as it is, but couldn't this page be displayed right-justified to the 'Browse Wikipedia by topic' block on the Main Page or (perhaps better) centered at the bottom of the Main Page? A 7 day queue could also be made by having MediaWiki:Pic of the day for Monday, MediaWiki:Pic of the day for Tuesday, ... ect and using {{msg:Pic of the day for {{CURRENTDAYNAME}}. I was thinking of doing that for my own images to spice up my user page. --mav 01:11, 22 May 2004 (UTC)

That would be a good idea, but it won't work with the new software. It might be best to wait until these sort of links are supported before making any more of them. Angela 14:17, May 24, 2004 (UTC)

Yes - it works at least for days of the week. I'll have to check the other variables. --mav

I've already made 366 of them - one for each day of the year for the selected anniversaries section on the Main Page. You have no idea how utterly pissed I would be and how much noise I would make if that stopped working. --mav 07:53, 25 May 2004 (UTC)

The developers are aware of it. Don't get upset just yet. Only aa: and af: have been upgraded so far so it'll be a while before they get to en. I expect they'll find an alternative solution before then, and if they don't - your work isn't lost. It just means manually updating the Main Page once a day rather than relying on {{CURRENTDAY}}. The 366 pages will still be used. Angela 08:33, May 25, 2004 (UTC)

It would be a major pain to have to do that. Why was this feature broken? --mav

Mav's system for the selected anniversiaris was ingenious when he found it. The developers really should preserve and expand that use of MediaWiki elements. ✏ Sverdrup 17:31, 26 May 2004 (UTC)

Yay! It's been fixed. :) I'll create the subpages now. Angela. 23:07, May 26, 2004 (UTC)

---

Could there be few simple templates with single things, to be used e.g. as:

[[Image:{{POTD/file}}|thumb|100px|{{POTD/caption}}]]

which today would expand to:

   [[Image:Arizona cap canal.jpg|thumb|100px|Arizona cap canal]]

in addition to the standard and complete {{pic of the day}} and {{POTD}} templates, so one could make a thumb easily? I would suggest these:

1. {{POTD/file}} — today it would be "Arizona cap canal.jpg"
2. {{POTD/caption}} — today "Arizona cap canal"
3. {{POTD/article}} — today "Central Arizona Project Aqueduct"

of course it could be named {{pic of the day/file}} or {{POTD file}} or {{POTDF}} or whatever would seem to be best here (the shortest ones would probably be preferable), but it would be very useful to have those basic things accessible independently.

Rafał Pocztarski 21:48, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

It would be great to have it for every weekday version of {{POTD}}, like maybe {{POTD Monday/file}} or {{POTDF Monday}} to build nice rotating thumbnail galleries easily composed into user pages etc.

Rafał Pocztarski 21:53, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

To avoid causing corruption of the link table, the template has to be updated manually each day. This already involves editing template:POTD, template:pic of the day, the two templates that relate to the current day, the archive, and featured images page. It is not practical to add another three templates on top of this. If you want to keep the three new templates updated every day, go ahead, but I don't think it is going to be widely enough used to go to the effort of maintaining this. Perhaps there is some easier way of doing it using parameters in templates? Angela. 21:13, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)

Broken

Argh! It's broken now. -Fadookie 05:22, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hey

Somebody let me know when its fixed, will ya? [[User:Sam Spade|Sam]] Spade wishes you a merry Christmas! 22:24, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

User page

Is it possible to use the picture of the day on user page? I just want the image though not the whole template. Plus, I want it to update everyday when there is a new picture of the day. Possible? • Thorpe • 17:27, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

More or less. Your two options are to add {{Pic of the day}} to get the version with a caption as shown here, or add {{POTD}} for the condensed version. Both update automatically each day. In the past we have tried some experiments so that the POTD version can take a parameter to specify a prefered width for the picture - but we haven't really got that cracked. -- Solipsist 17:56, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

box and heading

the box and heading should go on this template. Or there should at least also be a version without them, so they can be used in more different contexts. Such as some main pages. Maybe the best solution is to create

{{Wikipedia:Today's featured picture/{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

, just like for featured articles. Then this template and POTD can transclude that and add box and heading. It would allow me to add this item to my personal main page and to the simple main page. --MarSch 11:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

done -- Zondor 07:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Why?

Why is there èèèèÈ on the template? - User:Thelb4 11:45, 5 September 2005

Well we are coming towards the end of the 3rd quarter, and we need to use up our European quota for grave accents, otherwise we might not be allowed any next year. ... oh wait no, its just the usual reason - some minor vandalism to the current Pic of the Day selection at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/September 5, 2005. I've reverted it now. -- Solipsist 12:05, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

grammar

on the description of today's geisha picture, shouldn't it be "art forms" instead of "arts forms", or is this a British English usage that I'm not familiar with?--Alhutch 05:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

What butterflies?

Could somebody add in that the Monarch Butterflies are North American butterflies known for their southward migration> When I hear south, I tend to think Spain, not Mexico. The Minister of War ^(Peace) 23:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh duuuh. This is just a transclusion. Damn that POTD is difficult to find! The Minister of War ^(Peace) 23:45, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

What happened

What happened to it? It is blank. --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 03:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Aliens?!?

Why is this under the Pic of the Day: "Aliens are coming out of the sky! Requires a magnifying glass to view them, please be careful or you will be abducted" Jumping cheese 22:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Slight mistake on today's caption

I believe he was already Lord Foster by the time the Great Court was opened, not Sir Norman, although I may be wrong. Badgerpatrol 00:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm, tricky. According to our article on him, his peerage was in 1999. So yes he would have been Lord Foster by the time the reading room opened, although I guess it was Sir Foster for most of the restoration. In either case, it might be easier to avoid the reference altogether. Foster and Partners certainly designed the glass roof for the Great Court redevelopment, but I wouldn't be so sure that they were involved in any (minimal) changes to interior of the reading room illustrated. -- Solipsist 08:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's_featured_picture

Is there any reason for this page to exist? I don't want to put it up for deletion in case there's something important about it I'm not getting but it looks like it's not being used any more and that it should be a redirect. Jellypuzzle | ^Talk 11:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Change center alignment to justified

Whenever the image is very wide, the text is placed below the image and is center aligned. As described in the article on alignment, "Centered text is considered less readable for a body of text made up of multiple lines because the ragged starting edges make it difficult for the reader to track from one line to the next." I propose that it be changed to justified alignment. Kent Wang 13:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 25 August 2019

Please amend the template text to:

{{POTD/{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{date|{{#time:Y-m-d}}}}}}}|default}}<noinclude>
{{documentation}}
</noinclude>

This should allow the template to accept any valid date formats to display the corresponding POTD and also provide for a documentation page. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 01:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done Izno (talk) 18:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)