This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
I'd like to move forward with merging in {{Legal recognition of polygamy}}, and cleaning up after everything is done. I'd like to proceed with the following checklist.
Done check if all links in Legal recognition of polygamy are on this template
Done check if all pages in which Legal recognition of polygamy is transcluded have this template. If not, add it.
Done delete the template Legal recognition of polygamy
If I had a penny for every time I messed that up, I'd have 20, or 30 cent. Come to think of it, that's not all that much. But yes, that's what I meant (and fixed above). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Possibly, I haven't seen it yet. I've removed the first 10 transclusions and inserted this template where it wasn't yet present. Maybe give this a day or two to see if it's not going to attract reversions/screaming hordes? In the mean time I'll take a look at {{Africa topic|Polygamy in}}
I can see the case for using {{Polygamous marriage}} rather than {{Africa topic|Polygamy in}}, but I think having both is for now the better solution. It's less likely to bring out the pitchforks, and more in line with the letter of the TfD. I don't know much about the subject anyway, and to make a call that's outside of my comfort zone in subject matter, and not directly in line with the outcome of a tfd decision makes me a little uncomfortable. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply