Template talk:R from alternative transliteration
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 1234qwer1234qwer4 in topic Printworthiness
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Template:R from alternative transliteration is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit extended-protected}} to notify an administrator, template editor or extended-confirmed editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
More common means correct?=
edit"This is a redirect from an alternative English transliteration to a more common variation. The correct spelling is given by the target page name," seems to imply that the less common transliteration is not correct. Surely a better word than correct can be used here. Is the second sentence necessary at all? Rwflammang (talk) 22:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Printworthiness
editCan this template be modified so that redirects tagged with it can be categorised as printworthy? Some, such as Kwangtung, would definitely be useful in a print version. Geolodus (talk) 16:57, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Geolodus: I can add a parameter so that the default unprintworthiness can be changed. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)