Template talk:R to decade
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | Template:R to decade is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
 | This template (Template:R to decade) was considered for deletion on August 2005. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
 | Note: Any changes made to this template's content needs to be checked as workable in the tables on the references which include it directly: |
Add documentation
edit{{Edit protected}}
Please add the following wiki-text to allow this template to have documentation.
<noinclude>
{{documentation}}
<!-- Add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage, not here! -->
</noinclude>
– Allen4names 02:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. – Allen4names 18:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Needs Rcats
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Template:R to decade needs added Rcats. Please add the Rcats as follows:
#REDIRECT [[Template:Redirect to decade]]
(PLEASE LEAVE THIS LINE BLANK)
{{Redr|from move|to redirect template|from template shortcut}}
Thank you very much! – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX ) 08:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Done. You forgot protected. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Good catch! – Paine Ellsworth ( CLIMAX ) 21:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Scope?
editDo we want this used on topical articles? E.g., a redirect from "2017 in underwater basketweaving" to "Underwater basketweaving in the 2010s"? If this is not desirable, we should probably say so clearly or someone will use it that way. If it is desirable, we should say so clearly anyway, so people can be sure that's okay. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 07:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Edit request
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Per MOS:DASHES, please repalace "from 1700–500 BCE" by "from 1700 to 500 BCE". Thanks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Done – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
