Template talk:Rabbinic Literature
Latest comment: 2 years ago by JDspeeder1 in topic Date specification: AD or CE?
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Organization
editHi. Very nice so far! I suggest dividing it into three parts:
- Talmudic literature (Mishnah, Yerushalmi, and Bavli as you already have now, plus Tosefta & tangentially also masekhtot ketanot)
- Halakhic Midrashim - these include only Mekhilta (both of them), Sifra, and Sifrei. All of the other things listed are actually aggadic midrashim.
- Aggadic midrashim - this will be a pretty long list.
Good luck! Dovi 21:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Dovi. That's just the kind of help I'm looking for! I'm discovering much of this stuff for the first time (unfortunately), so I need that sort of guidance. If you have time, can you also look at the "midrash table" that I'm making at the Rabbinical literature page, and tell me if there are errors? Thanks a bunch. —Dfass 21:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. Where would you put Tosefta? Oh, never mind, I see it.
Date specification: AD or CE?
editThe dates for this Jewish template are given as AD. Might they be given as CE?
Feline Hymnic (talk) 16:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Dates should absolutely be given in BCE/CE in any Jewish context. Good catch! --JDspeeder1 (talk) 11:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Picture caption
editThe entire caption is italicized. It should be just the name of the painting. --JDspeeder1 (talk) 11:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)