Template talk:Slavic-language terms for administrative divisions
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Altes in topic "Darugha"
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template name concerns
editThe following announcement and subsequent discussion were copied from Portal:Russia/New article announcements#December 1-15. I am seeking comments regarding this template's name.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Template:Slavic terms for country subdivisions by User:Tobias Conradi. The criterion for this assortment is not clear. For instance, there is obshchina, but no mir (social), pogost or khutor. --Ghirla -трёп- 07:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Mir and khutor do not qualify, as technically they were not "subdivisions", but rather inhabited localities. I added pogost, though. Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Still, it is very strange to see "raion" and "selsoviet" listed among traditional "Slavic terms". --Ghirla -трёп- 18:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. The way this template is constructed now, the name of "Terms for subdivisions of Slavic countries" would be more appropriate. On a different note, why did you remove "powiat" and deitalicized "pogost" (which is a historical term)?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed. --Ghirla -трёп- 18:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. The way this template is constructed now, the name of "Terms for subdivisions of Slavic countries" would be more appropriate. On a different note, why did you remove "powiat" and deitalicized "pogost" (which is a historical term)?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Still, it is very strange to see "raion" and "selsoviet" listed among traditional "Slavic terms". --Ghirla -трёп- 18:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Mir and khutor do not qualify, as technically they were not "subdivisions", but rather inhabited localities. I added pogost, though. Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Silrada is not a historic subdivision, but present time one.--Tomakiv (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
"Darugha"
editAltough according to article this term was used in Russian Empire, I have a great doubts that it is correct to say that darugha is a Slavic term. Altes (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)