Template talk:Taxonomy/Cnidaria
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Crvscience2022 in topic Petalonamae?
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2020
editThis edit request to Template:Taxonomy/Myxozoa has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Amarnathd (talk) 08:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 09:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 8 January 2022
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Aurelia comes under the phylum Coelenterata not Cnidaria, please do consider this change. 117.248.122.174 (talk) 04:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the template
{{Taxonomy/Cnidaria}}
. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. Talk:Aurelia (cnidarian) would probably be a better place. In any case, you'll need to cite reliable sources in support of your request. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2022
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The phylum Cnidaria should be set to its phylum being Cnidaria. How could it possibly be Petalonamae, an entirely extinct clade? 76.144.49.221 (talk) 06:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RealAspects (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Petalonamae?
editWhy does the Cnidaria taxobox link to Petalonamae, and not to its own page? Petalonamae is a poorly known group from the Ediacaran with no known living relations -- AFAIK, it's not even clear they were animals at all. 151.30.138.200 (talk) 14:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- It has been fixed however it is clear from reading the profile of the person who edited it that they are not qualified to make such an edit. Crvscience2022 (talk) 22:14, 24 December 2022 (UTC)