Template talk:Taxonomy/Opisthokonta
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Template-protected edit request on 5 June 2018
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change parent to obazoa. For validity please check obazoa and or opistokonta article. Jmv2009 (talk) 17:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, it might be time to retire Unikonta from templates and taxoboxes. Even Cavalier-Smith abandoned the name when it became clear that uniciliate opisthokonts and amoebozoa are ancestrally biciliate. If a clade name of identical composition is needed, Amorphea will do. Deuterostome (Talk) 00:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit template-protected}}
template. - Jmv2009 - for future requests (and probably your other requests which are still active) it would help if,
- when you say "For validity please check obazoa and or opistokonta article." you linked the articles you want checked - obazoa & opistokonta;
- those articles backed up your request a bit more confidently ~ "Obazoa (Brown, 2013) is a proposed sister", "In some recent research, Obazoa is not seen as a clade."
- WT:WikiProject Tree of Life seems the place to get consensus rather than here, a page with <30 watchers. Cabayi (talk) 13:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
- Proposed is common scientific language for: As for as we can tell this is the way it is with pretty high fidelity, but any science is ultimately subject to new insights. In fact, I'm using the wording as well standard on wikipedia. The fact is, this view appears currently the best supported by the scientific articles. Modification is always possible, such as when new groups are found and inserted in the tree. Jmv2009 (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Done Cabayi (talk) 10:51, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Proposed is common scientific language for: As for as we can tell this is the way it is with pretty high fidelity, but any science is ultimately subject to new insights. In fact, I'm using the wording as well standard on wikipedia. The fact is, this view appears currently the best supported by the scientific articles. Modification is always possible, such as when new groups are found and inserted in the tree. Jmv2009 (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 14 February 2023
editHAISTAKAAA PASKAAA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.143.239.107 (talk) 06:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 15 September 2024
editIt is requested that an edit be made to the template-protected template at Template:Taxonomy/Opisthokonta. (edit · history · last · links · transclusion count · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately.
Edit requests to template-protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |
Hey! Can a template editor/admin change rank to clade instead of having it as unranked. Thanks! Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)