Template:Taxonomy/Opisthokonta is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Protista, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of protists and protistology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ProtistaWikipedia:WikiProject ProtistaTemplate:WikiProject ProtistaProtista articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetictree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Taxonomy/Opisthokonta is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Yes, it might be time to retire Unikonta from templates and taxoboxes. Even Cavalier-Smith abandoned the name when it became clear that uniciliate opisthokonts and amoebozoa are ancestrally biciliate. If a clade name of identical composition is needed, Amorphea will do. Deuterostome (Talk)00:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Jmv2009 - for future requests (and probably your other requests which are still active) it would help if,
when you say "For validity please check obazoa and or opistokonta article." you linked the articles you want checked - obazoa & opistokonta;
those articles backed up your request a bit more confidently ~ "Obazoa (Brown, 2013) is a proposed sister", "In some recent research, Obazoa is not seen as a clade."
Proposed is common scientific language for: As for as we can tell this is the way it is with pretty high fidelity, but any science is ultimately subject to new insights. In fact, I'm using the wording as well standard on wikipedia. The fact is, this view appears currently the best supported by the scientific articles. Modification is always possible, such as when new groups are found and inserted in the tree. Jmv2009 (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the 
Done Cabayi (talk) 10:51, 7 June 2018 (UTC)