This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Should we really have all those nonsense icons behind all those railway stations? They're not even correct (there are, since the abolishment of CityNightLine, no DB-trains calling at Amsterdam as the IC Amsterdam - Berlin and the ICE Amsterdam - Germany (- Switzerland) fall within the Netherlands under full responsibility of NS and NS-material is used for these services) and I'm not aware of any NMBS-trains calling at Aachen. Also, why would the Amsterdam metro be mentioned after "Amsterdam Central", but not the Rotterdam or Antwerp metro behind their respective city's stations? But is it even worth mentioning at all? Naturally, at railway stations, you can transfer to domestic trains of that country. What is the additional value of the NS/DB/NMBS/RER-logo here? And obviously, at a station carrying the name "central", it would be remarkable if it wasn't served by local public transport, such as metros. Do we really need to indicate that? I would say it's rather obsolete. PPP (talk) 11:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
