This template is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Thelema, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ThelemaWikipedia:WikiProject ThelemaTemplate:WikiProject ThelemaThelema articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I see no reason why the Thelema box and Thelema series should remain separate entities. It seems in the best interest of general knowledge that they be merged.
They serve different purposes. One goes at the end of an article, the other usually near the top of the article. Most other subjects also have these two styles of template, so I am removing your merge suggestion. 68.92.150.232 (talk) 15:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
It was my merge tag addition, sorry I didn't add to the talkpage thread. They should be merged because it is not an WP:Article series, but instead a collection of related topics which hence belong in a footer navbox (like a cohesive see-also section). I'll work on merging the 2, so that all the content appears in the footer box. (done). I've left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thelema too. -- Quiddity18:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply