Template talk:Twenty20 leagues

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Norwestie in topic West Indies, Pakistan and East Africa

unauthorised

edit

ICL is "unauthorised"? Unauthorised by who? Maybe it should be called private, I am changing it to that for now. --ti 22:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well its unauthorised by the ICC, but Private works just as well I guess Mattlore (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
True, but Wikipedia and the outside world have not "authorised" the IPL either. --ti 17:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Professional?

edit

Why is only the IPL deemed to be "professional" when all or most of the domestic competitions listed are contested by full-time cricketers? 118.208.219.125 (talk) 09:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Private

edit

Perhaps "Not ICC sanctioned" would be a better description. It is not as if the ICC affiliated boards are publicly owned or controlled. 118.208.219.125 (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

West Indies, Pakistan and East Africa

edit

I propose that the Caribbean T20, Pakistan Premier League and East Africa Premier League should be in a separate section called 'Regional Leagues'. This is because they have teams that are not from one country so they do not belong in the 'Domestic' section, and they are not truly 'International'. Norwestie (talk) 10:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply