This template is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I plan to change the portion that is heading to the planned Old Orchard station. It has the pictogram for interruption, when it should be the pictogram for planned line. I am going to give it a day or so for anyone to object right now. Here it is, with my proposed edit on top, and the original below. (focus solely on the "Proposed Old Orchard" portion):
I do have to object to this proposed change. You are correct that the proposed line does use the "interruption" set and that is not entirely correct. However, in this case, using the ex variant is ambiguous since it would be used to depict both a former line and a proposed line without differentiation. The proper way to deal with this situation is to add a key for non-standard usage. (This is already in use at Template:Green Line (CTA), for instance). I'll go ahead and add that now.
